Carl had Three Questions:
#1. Why does there appear to be such a taboo against the book of Revelations? I noticed that it is never a part of the readings, nor is it ever mentioned. This leads me to my second question.
According to my Lectionary (the book of Readings for the Mass) the book of Revelation is part of the weekday readings during weeks 33 and 34 of Year II. We are currently in week 31 of Year I so we will not hear them during the weekdays this year, but we will hear them for two weeks around this time next year. This year the selections will come from the Book of Maccabees and the Book of the Prophet Daniel. The second Reading from the Chrism Mass is from Revelation. The Second Reading on Sundays during the Easter Season (Cycle C) are from the book of Revelation. We are currently in Cycle and a getting ready to start Cycle B, so those reading will not be next Easter, but will be read for seven weeks the year after next. The book of Revelation is read on the Feast of All Saints, and is one of the possible selections in the Rite of Funerals and in the Rite of Marriage.
Normally I preach on the Gospel Text, rather than on the first or second reading. If I see the Book of Revelation coming up, I may feel inclined to focus on it after your question. I have a series of six videos on the Book of Revelation. If you want to get a bunch of your friends together a watch them with me over a series of weeks, I would be glad to answer any questions you may have.
#2. How literally should we take revelations? It says for instance in Revelations that on the Rapture, birds will fly from the sky and attack. Are we to take this as a literal statement, or as a symbolic statement? After all, how is a man from ancient times supposed to describe say an airplane, or other flying machine?
The Book of Revelation is a book of signs. Apocalyptic Literature was a kind of literature very popular in the Roman period. It was device used in a time of persecution to transmit writings without them being understood by the enemy if discovered.
For example it says in Revelations, Chapter five: (Rev 5:6)
Then I saw standing in the midst of the throne and the four living creatures and the elders, a Lamb that seemed to have been slain. He had seven horns and seven eyes; these are the seven spirits of God sent out into the whole world.You know as well as I do that Lambs do not normally sit on thrones, especially dead ones, so we are dealing with a sign of contradiction. Seven is an ancient Hebrew number signifying completeness, or sometimes even being the number for God. So we are not to picture a lamb with seven horns or seven eyes, but a lamb with complete power that can see everything and everyone. This slain lamb, seated on the throne, all powerful, is Jesus, who once was dead but now is Risen and living and ruling.
The book of Revelation does not predict the future; it describes the present and provides catechesis and comfort in a time of great persecution.
It is the images from the book of Revelation that form an important part of the Mass. Did you know that the whole mass is from the scriptures and is based on the scriptures and that much of the words of the Mass come from the Scriptures? The Lamb of the book of Revelation is the same Lamb of God we sing of each time we break the bread. There is an image of this Lamb on the front of our altar. It is an embroidered Lamb seated on the Book with its seven seals.
By the Way, the word “Rapture” does not occur in the Book of Revelation or in the rest of the Scripture. It is not part of Catholic belief and basically displays and inaccurate interpretation of some of these signs from the book of Revelation.
#3. My last question deals with Purgatory. From the research that I have done, the Catholic Church appears to have made this concept up around the time when they made people pay money for their sins (during the medieval era). Are we to believe in Purgatory? Doesn't Purgatory contradict the idea that Christ will judge the good and the bad, thus not allowing for anybody in this "gray zone"?
Here is what the
Catechism says on Purgatory, stating at Paragraph 1030It appears that you have done some of your “research” in Fundamentalist Literature. It is classic Protestant device to claim that we made up some of what we believe. Certainly the Catechism mentions the Medieval Councils that took up the discussion of Purgatory, but there is a great deal of evidence in the early centuries that Catholics took belief in Purgatory for granted. In the fourth Century St. Monica was recorded to have asked her son, St. Augustine, to offer masses for her after her death. In The catacombs the inscriptions on the tombs remind other Christians to pray for the dead, and certainly the idea of praying for the dead is found in the scriptures.
When you go to the site where the Church’s teaching on Purgatory is, be sure to click on the footnotes to discover the sources, like St Gregory (9th century) and St. John Chrysostom (4th century), and the Scriptures, Corinthians and Maccabees. It is knowledge of these sources that reach into the earliest days of the Church that will show that the Church has been pretty consistent in its teaching and did not make up a bunch of stuff in the medieval period.
We have Adult Faith Formation every Tuesday Night and you would always be welcome to attend, to learn and to ask any questions.
Here is a link to the class schedule. Let me know if you have any questions about what I wrote here.